Early Modern Era · 1720s
Smallpox Inoculation
Defying Divine Will and “Playing God”
The earliest attempts at smallpox inoculation — a technique called variolation, in which a small dose of live smallpox was scratched under the skin to trigger a milder, survivable case, and the direct precursor to Jenner's vaccine — came with a charge that sounds surprisingly contemporary. It was blasphemous. On 8 July 1722, the Anglican minister Edmund Massey climbed into the pulpit of St Andrew's Holborn in London and denounced the practice as a "Diabolical Operation" that "tends... to anticipate and banish Providence out of the World." His reasoning: disease was God's tool for punishing sin, and warding it off by human artifice was an act of impious interference with divine judgement.
The previous year in Boston, a Puritan minister called Cotton Mather had pushed the same technique during a deadly outbreak. Mather had first heard about it from Onesimus, an enslaved West African in his household who described the practice as routine in his homeland. Mather persuaded a local physician, Zabdiel Boylston, to try it. Together they inoculated more than 240 residents. Mortality among them dropped from roughly 14% (the typical death rate for natural infection) to about 2%. The response was not gratitude. Mather's house was firebombed. Boylston was chased by mobs. A demonstrably risk-reducing practice was portrayed as an impious attempt to "play God," and public acceptance was slowed for decades.
The underlying concern — that human artifice was muscling in on divine providence — has re-emerged with every major biomedical intervention since. Inoculation won. The question of who mediates between nature and human will has never stopped being contested.
The previous year in Boston, a Puritan minister called Cotton Mather had pushed the same technique during a deadly outbreak. Mather had first heard about it from Onesimus, an enslaved West African in his household who described the practice as routine in his homeland. Mather persuaded a local physician, Zabdiel Boylston, to try it. Together they inoculated more than 240 residents. Mortality among them dropped from roughly 14% (the typical death rate for natural infection) to about 2%. The response was not gratitude. Mather's house was firebombed. Boylston was chased by mobs. A demonstrably risk-reducing practice was portrayed as an impious attempt to "play God," and public acceptance was slowed for decades.
The underlying concern — that human artifice was muscling in on divine providence — has re-emerged with every major biomedical intervention since. Inoculation won. The question of who mediates between nature and human will has never stopped being contested.
Useful links:
- Arthur Boylston – *Defying Providence: Smallpox and the Forgotten 18th-Century Medical Revolution* (2012)
- Genevieve Miller – *The Adoption of Inoculation for Smallpox in England and France* (U. Pennsylvania Press, 1957)
- Wellcome Collection – Massey’s 1722 Sermon (scan)
- Origins.OSU – Top Ten Origins: Vaccination (Otter, 2015)